So, what about the writ?

Mammoth’s Town Council did not directly address the court writ demanding full payment of the Town’s $43 million debt by June 30th.

Mammoth’s Assistant Town Manager Marianna Marysheva-Martinez called it “an exciting night” – the passage of the Town’s budget Wednesay night on time and balanced.  What neither she nor anyone else addressed was the second half of the agenda item – what will the Town do in response to the court writ, due June 30th, that demands payment of MLLA’s $43 million debt.

Or, maybe they did address it – sideways.  Sierra Wave Media has calls in to Town Manager Dave Wilbrecht and to Martinez to clarify what the Town will do on June 30th when the writ orders Mammoth to pay the big lawsuit debt.  Clearly, the Town can not pay off the debt in one day, and even a ten-year payment plan allowed by the writ would seem to be out of the question.  We await response from officials.

What Martinez did say in her budget presentation, which had already been said – under the Town’s budget reduction plan, a surplus would be created that would allow payments to MLLA and other creditors but not huge payments.  Bankruptcy may lie ahead.  Mayor Pro Tem Rick Wood commented that there have by necessity been many closed sessions with a “looming, potential bankruptcy.”

Martinez only said that the Town is going through the state-mandated mediation process with creditors and employee groups.  The mandate is in bankruptcy law.  Observers speculate that the Town’s highly paid legal and financial team has advised against greater public comment on the MLLA and bankruptcy issue until the final hour.

As for the budget, the same information discussed over many weeks was repeated with some new information.  Martinez explained the cuts to make up a $2.8 million shortfall.  As Mayor Pro Tem Wood said, virtually all areas of Town government have been cut.  Employee concessions of a 10% cut and 24% for police is expected.  Workers will have to start paying their own retirement contributions.  Airport Manager Bill Manning’s job is gone as is Dave Beck of Public Works, and many other positions have been cut and other lay-offs are possible.  Martinez said the Town will implement the Budget Reduction Plan whether employee agreements are signed or not.

On the revenue side, officials will emphasize transient occupancy tax collection.  Martinez repeated the FTI report data that Mammoth’s citizens are already over-taxed, not wealthy and could not sustain an additional tax burden. So the Town will not try to raise more taxes to pay government bills.

Mayor Pro Tem Wood described the budget process as unlike no other, conservative, and fiscally prudent, arrived at, he said, with no rancor.  Mayor Matthew Lehman called for the vote. The Council approved the budget documents unanimously.

About Benett Kessler

Always interested in writing, Benett was the editor of her high school paper, proceeded to the University of Chicago and then out West where she and John Heston formed Eastern Sierra News Service in Inyo County. They fed film to KNXT in Los Angeles and co-wrote and produced the first daily radio news in the Eastern Sierra. Their work ranged from a published news magazine to the first television newscast. They continued to provide videotaped news to KABC and other news outlets. After a seat on the Mammoth Times board and work as newswriter, Benett formed her own company, Sierra Broadcasters and launched an FM radio station, now KSRW and a broadcast television station, KSRW-TV33. The latest addition - Sierrawave.net. Her company motto: Comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable.

Stay Connected

Sign up (for free) to receive an email when we post new articles. Sent by Google's FeedBurner. Easily unsubscribe at any time. Never spammy!

, , , ,

5 Responses to So, what about the writ?

  1. Jake June 22, 2012 at 7:27 am #

    That budget is FOOLS GOLD….

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2

  2. Still around? June 22, 2012 at 12:44 pm #

    Why do people keep voting John Eastman into the fracus?
    Hasn’t he done enough to F up the town?

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1

    • upthecreek June 22, 2012 at 3:50 pm #

      Because they a Sheep and they know No Better
      BAAAAAA BAAAAAAAAAAA

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

  3. upthecreek June 22, 2012 at 3:56 pm #

    “Martinez repeated the FTI report data that Mammoth’s citizens are already over-taxed, not wealthy and could not sustain an additional tax burden. So the Town will not try to raise more taxes to pay government bills”

    Since when has that stopped any Gov agency from Overtaxing its sheeple.
    GGW

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  4. Martin P. June 23, 2012 at 10:29 pm #

    Here is a simple idea. What if a settlement could be reached that gave MLLA a percentage of all TOT for say 20 years. The percentage would be calculated so that if TOT revenues were as predicted over 20 years (obviously an impossible prediction, but seems like those involved could come to a reasonable agreement, say 5% increase per year as the budget currently states) would result in say 80% payment of the judgment or 34 million with no additional interest. In order to get 100% of the judgment TOT would have to increase by around 7.5%. Here is the kicker, the amount MLLA gets would not be limited to 100% of the judgment. They would get their entire allotted share of TOT for 20 years be it only 50% of the judgment or 500%. This would make MLLA an entity with one simple goal, spend the next 20 years doing everything possible to increase TOT in Mammoth. MLLA would then have three options: 1. Sit back and enjoy a generous yearly stipend. 2. Leverage every penny available into the promotion and development of Mammoth Lakes and amass a real fortune. 3. Sell the company to someone with deep enough pockets to give MLLA the big pile of upfront cash they so covet, and the smarts to turn their newly acquired agreement with the town into their own fortune. If TOT revenue is currently 10,000,000 and they would agree to a 5% increase per year for 20 years, that would result in only 10% percentage of TOT for 20 years, or an upfront budget cut of $1,000,000. Sounds reasonable to me, but would certainly have all kinds of crazy consequences when you mix big corporate greed into the fabric of a small town. But essentially, a one time permanent (for 20 years) cut of 1 million (would be 2.5 million per year at 5% growth in 20 years, but would not be “missed” as it would never be budgeted in to the TOML budget) would result in an entity whose sole job would be to promote and develop the town. What a huge incentive to promote the town. Increase TOT by 10% rather than 5% and receive over 57 million. A 15% increase would earn them 102 million.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply