BrightSource solar projects with “significant” impacts

bright

While Inyo County remains in sharp disagreement with BrightSource Energy over the cost to the County of their Hidden Hills Solar project near Death Valley, BrightSource has other business issues that have made news. And, both parties now await a decision from the California Energy Commission on the Hidden Hills project permit. The CEC staff has found that the project would have problematic impacts.

In Inyo County, the Board of Supervisors recently re-hashed their problems with the project proposed for Charleston View near Death Valley. Officials continue to resist the project since their consultants and staff say the project will cost Inyo County as much as $90 million in impacts – mostly law enforcement and road repairs from major traffic and 2300 employees. Inyo officials also have a problem with the fact that BrightSource has failed to submit a complete General Plan Amendment application that is needed for their project.

However, the California Energy Commission has the final say. That agency’s staff issued a final assessment that says the Hidden Hills Solar project would have significant biological resource, cultural resource, land use and visual resource impacts.

The summary of the Energy Commission staff assessment says that the Hidden Hills Solar Electric Generating System “does not comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and standards and will have significant impacts to the environment after the implementation of all feasible mitigation.” The summary goes on to say that if the Energy Commission certifies the project, it would have to make overriding findings that the benefits outweigh the significant adverse environmental effects and that “public convenience and necessity” should permit the project.

Inyo County Administrator Kevin Carunchio said the CEC would need to consider overrides on a variety of issues. Carunchio said, “Our hope is that the CEC will take a very close look at these overrides, particularly those related to local agencies’ ordinances, regulations and statutes and the related impacts that could result from any override.” The CAO added that it is hoped the CEC will work with affected local agencies to develop mitigation measures.

In other news about BrightSource Energy, the Saturday Los Angeles Times reported that Southern California Edison and BrightSource “mutually terminated” a power purchase agreement for two projects near Blythe, California. The article said that BrightSource has asked the CEC to put those projects on hold.

 

Share/Bookmark

, , , ,

One Response to BrightSource solar projects with “significant” impacts

  1. sierragrl January 23, 2013 at 11:49 am #

    Hmmm, $90 million? I’d like to see where that number comes from. As far as I can tell, the 2,300 hundred employees are for the 2 year construction period. Longterm employment numbers say 100 employees. Based on the location of the site, its hard to see where Inyo County would have to improve many miles of roads….not too mention typically new developments can be required to either fund road improvements or do them themselves. Employees would be living in Pahrump, so most of the ‘policing’ required would be done by Nevada authorities. Seems like Inyo County would see an increase in property tax due to this development and possibly receive other tax benefits from this development, while having very few impacts on Inyo County at all. There could be environmental downsides to this development but if thats Inyo County’s issue, then they should say that.

    Perhaps Inyo County would rather cede this area to Nevada and let them deal with the development and reap the benefits?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3

Leave a Reply



KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design