Environmental groups and tribe attack DWP practices


This area northeast of Big Pine was damaged by past LADWP pumping.


LADWP Negative Declaration for the Big Pine Northeast Regreening Project is 
Deemed Inadequate by the Owens Valley Committee, Sierra Club and Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley; Lawsuit Filed in Inyo Superior Court

Bishop, April, 6, 2012 — The Owens Valley Committee (OVC), Sierra Club and Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley have partnered to challenge the Negative Declaration for the Big Pine Northeast Regreening Project certified by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) March 6, 2012.  The three groups have filed suit in Inyo County Superior Court to overturn the decision to approve the project and to order LADWP to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR).  The groups contend that operating a groundwater pump to replace surface water supplied to the project may have significant impacts on the environment and that under state law LADWP is required to prepare an EIR to properly disclose and evaluate those potential impacts.

The Big Pine Regreening Project is a mitigation measure for impacts in the Big Pine area caused by previous water management practices


LADWP wants to export more water to make up for surface water used to mitigate damage done by pumps.

and groundwater-pumping activities by LADWP as identified in their 1991 EIR “Water from the Owens Valley to Supply the Second Los Angeles Aqueduct, 1970 to 1990 and 1990 Onward, Pursuant to a Long Term Groundwater Management Plan”.  A revised description for the project was agreed upon by LADWP and Inyo County in 2010.  The project provides for 30 acres of land northeast of Big Pine to be irrigated and seeded with a pasture mix to support livestock grazing.  The Big Pine Canal will provide up to 150 acre-feet of water per year for the Regreening Project.

The 2010 revised project description states that the irrigation is contingent on LADWP being allowed to pump Well W375 to replace (or export) an amount of groundwater equivalent to that supplied to the project each year from the Big Pine Canal.  Well W375 is located approximately three miles southeast of the Big Pine Northeast Regreening Project and has been in OFF status in accordance with the on/off provisions in the Inyo/LA Water Agreement for more than a decade due to insufficient soil water, deep water table, and poor vegetation conditions.  The project is contingent on Inyo and LA exempting Well W375 from the on/off provisions of the Water Agreement.  It is that exemption that is the cause of concern for the three parties bringing the lawsuit.

“Over the past century, LADWP has aggressively pursued the destruction of our homeland for its benefit,” commented Big Pine Tribal Chairperson Virgil Moose. “The Tribe wants to see a benefit out of mitigation projects…not more negative impacts on our lands.”
The groups charge that LADWP’s action in adopting the Negative Declaration constitutes a violation of the California Environmental Quality Act because LADWP failed to prepare an environmental impact report.   An EIR is required because evidence presented by the public indicates that the Big Pine Northeast Regreening Project may have a significant impact on the environment.

“DWP has an obligation to comply with the mitigation measures provided in the 1991 EIR,” says Mark Bagley, spokesperson for the OVC and Sierra Club.  “To the extent that DWP seeks to replace the surface water with groundwater pumping it makes little sense as the mitigation measure seeks to mitigate for DWP’s groundwater pumping program.  If the mitigation measure includes increased groundwater pumping, then such additional groundwater pumping must be fully and completely analyzed.”

# # #


, , , ,

13 Responses to Environmental groups and tribe attack DWP practices

  1. Bob Loblaw April 10, 2012 at 4:52 pm #

    This seems like borrowing from Peter to pay… Well, Peter I guess.

  2. Trouble April 10, 2012 at 5:57 pm #

    Good job Big Pine Paiute.

  3. Badfinger April 10, 2012 at 7:04 pm #

    Leave DWP alone already, their engineers know what they’re doing, DWP has done fine managing the Owens Valley water resources for the past hundred years, and They will for the Next hundred years…

    • Ken Warner April 10, 2012 at 8:38 pm #


    • Trouble April 10, 2012 at 10:05 pm #

      Badfinger- I’d like to hear more about all the great things DWP has done for this Valley. I’m not seeing it.

    • NewEra April 11, 2012 at 8:13 am #

      Badfinger you can leave your Bias opinion in the DWP work truck or DWP office.
      “Leave DWP alone already” Not in my life time!!!!!

    • OV5G April 11, 2012 at 9:52 am #

      What planet are you on Badfinger? Or should I say, where does your paycheck come from???

    • erik simpson April 11, 2012 at 10:30 am #

      General discussion group advice: Don’t feed the trolls.

    • Concerned Owens Valley Resident April 11, 2012 at 1:47 pm #

      Tell that to the lakes, vegetation, animals and water tables in the Owens Valley!! The Valley is screaming for water….if DWP didn’t take the water in the FIRST place, we wouldn’t have to have a regreening project in our town of Big Pine!!!!

      Apparently Engineers don’t follow Environmental Impact Reports, so how can anyone say they are doing a good job??!! Look at pictures from the past…where did all the greenery go? Now, they are trying to have this project to HIDE their errors and taking water from other resources…you still think they are doing a good job?? I dont’ think so!

      Concerned For Our Future in Water Supply!!!!

  4. MJA April 10, 2012 at 8:46 pm #

    Thanks for trying!


  5. Jay April 11, 2012 at 7:16 am #

    Well, if it turns out that the environmental document is adequate, I hope that DWP counter-sues for attorney fees and staff time against the plaintiffs. There are too many frivolous lawsuits in this world, at it is time that people be held accountable for tying up the courts.

    • Benett Kessler April 11, 2012 at 8:06 am #

      Dear Jay, Why don’t you offer this advice to LADWP? Many now say their suit against Mammoth Lakes is frivolous since Mammoth secured and used their rights starting 50 years ago. Why would you assume the OVC, Sierra Club and Tribe have filed a frivolous suit? OVC and Sierra Club have a robust track record, especially on the Lower Owens River. Without those groups, we would not have had the re-watering of the river. Benett Kessler

  6. OV5G April 11, 2012 at 9:56 am #

    Seems like Inyo County should be working with OVC, BP Tribe and the Sierra Club. It would be nice to see those that were elected “man up” against DWP’s mighty dollar.

    Thanks to the entities who are working to protect our water resources and the resources that depend on it.


Leave a Reply

KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design