FAA staff to discuss air service in Mammoth, Bishop

By Deb Murphy

The Federal Aviation Administration will fly to the Eastern Sierra Friday to take a look at the Mammoth Lakes and Bishop airports, then meet with the Eastern Sierra Council of Government, for a discussion of regional air service.


Improvements to both facilities were the focus of consecutive Inyo County Board of Supervisors’ meetings, starting with a presentation by Mammoth’s Public Works Director Grady Dutton last week and Inyo’s counterpart, Clint Quilter yesterday.

Mammoth’s efforts to expand air service hit a snag with an injunction from the FAA in 2003. The injunction stemmed from a lawsuit over the California Environmental Quality Act review’s adequacy. That injunction was dissolved this past May, giving the town the green light to proceed with plans for a 40,000-square foot terminal with three gates and other improvements totaling $30 million.


The proposed terminal is “no Taj Mahal,” Dutton told the Supervisors, but a necessity to handle the volume of traffic, especially during the peak ski season. Dutton said the existing terminal barely handles one incoming and one outgoing plane. The new facility should be able to accommodate three in, three out with a total of 220 people coming and 220 going.

In reference to the upcoming visit by the FAA, Dutton said the two Eastern Sierra facilities “aren’t in competition. We have to have a regional approach.”

Quilter’s report to the Board went through a construction update –pavement work and security fencing are 95-percent completed—and progress on a Passenger Traffic Study, due in a few months. The study will give the County the information needed to determine the feasibility of providing passenger service to Bishop.

One issue both airports face is the choice of potential visitors to either spend time in an airport to fly or just hop in their cars and drive.

Bishop airport still has work to do. Quilter outlined additional phases to meet the needs of commercial flights, including a new terminal, apron and parking in Phase 1. Phase 2 would widen runways to 150-feet, provide for a covered walkway and baggage handling.

The final Phase 3 would include parallel runways and paving improvements with a 10-year window for completion. The total of all three phases is roughly $30 million with the FAA picking up $20 million of the cost.

The Board discussion focused on the obvious restrictions at Mammoth’s facility—little room for expansion and weather issues. While Dutton gave lip service to a regional approach to reliable air service, according to Quilter Inyo broached the topic of a partnership with Mammoth Lakes but got no real response.

Quilter’s assessment is that Mammoth has experience dealing with passenger traffic but the facility has physical constraints. On the other hand, Inyo has no experience dealing with airlines but the facility has few constraints. “We could lease our facility to Mammoth, have a joint operating agreement,” Quilter said. “There are a lot of ways to skin this cat if there’s a desire to do that.”

Quilter recommended that ESCOG form a sub-committee to look at a regional collaboration and figure out the best way to expand reliable, diversified air traffic to the Eastern Sierra.


, ,

4 Responses to FAA staff to discuss air service in Mammoth, Bishop

  1. Trouble July 28, 2016 at 4:27 pm #

    Bishop can’t even finish their own sidewalks. Good luck!

    • Are U Kidding July 29, 2016 at 2:01 pm #


      I can’t fathom the actual outcome.
      Bishop is going to compete with Mammoth for airline passengers?

      Mammoth is going to pay a premium to Divert a plane to bishop and then bus them to Mammoth? Does someone think this is a free scenario?

      Bishop is going to subsidize seats for these passenger planes?

      People are not going to prefer Landing in Bishop when their activities are in Mammoth.

      • Trouble August 1, 2016 at 8:15 am #

        Are you kidding, I believe Mammoth actually needs Bishops help .
        I have twice been left out in the cold at Mammoth Airport. Due to high winds and snow storm. Basically, loaded planes coming to Mammoth fly over the airport then deside if they can land safely. They circle a few times and then turn back to where ever they came from. Leaving the passengers and ticket holders in limbo. It’s either, get a room or rent a car time for most. For Bishop residents, we get to drive back to Bishop in the middle of a storm . The people on board are really dogged. They get to fly back and figure out what to do. Plus they have to try to get their luggage and luggage fees back. I never did get it me of my hidden fees back and had to drive myself to LAX that night. Mammoth needs us and we need a airport service also.
        I believe we need at least a daily fight to Reno airport from Bishop. Maybe a cargo center also.

  2. and again August 1, 2016 at 6:53 am #

    Mono County has been subsidizing the Mammoth airport all along. It does not stand on it’s own, it does not pay for itself. be careful Bishop. This is where ALL OF YOUR tax dollars will go from now on


Leave a Reply

KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design