by Charles James
Kermit the Frog probably hasn’t caused as much excitement and dismay as the mountain yellow-legged frog has in recent months for local politicians and residents of Inyo and Mono Counties, but then Kermit has a better publicist.
With thousands of acres of backcountry lakes being proposed as critical habitat for the Sierra-Nevada yellow-legged frog, Mountain yellow-legged frog, and the Yosemite Toad under the Endangered Species Act, the Inyo County Board of Supervisors recently expressed increasing alarm at the potential “socio-economic” impact the proposed critical habitat will have on local communities dependent on tourism, especially as there are a host of other endangered species found in Inyo County also being proposed; eight to be exact. The supervisors fear the “cumulative effect” of so many endangered species being listed not just in Inyo County, but also in the dozens of proposed endangered species listings in surrounding counties.
According to the California Fish and Wildlife the Mountain yellow-legged frogs in the Sierra Nevada live in high mountain lakes, ponds, tarns, and streams−largely in areas that were glaciated as recently as 10,000 years ago. There were no fish in the lakes until the mid-1800s when miners and settlers began bringing stock fish from other areas of the state to plant in the local waters, especially several varieties of trout.
Supervisor Linda Arcularius noted that even though the recent report from USFW said there would be no negative recreational impact, she could not understand how that could be as the greatest threat to the yellow-legged frog comes from the amphibian chytrid fungus and not from grazing or even the fish. The fungus, Arcularius noted, is spread by humans crossing into the critical habitat and carrying it over to another critical habitat literally on the bottom of their boots. “So how,” she asked, “can you stop that spread without restricting access which would affect recreation?”
The board discussed a proposed draft letter response to Secretary Jewell of the Interior Department expressing concern of the “cumulative effects” of so many endangered species on the economy of rural counties.
Associate Planner Elaine Kabala explained to the board that the endangered species proposed within Inyo County over the next five years besides the yellow-legged frog include the Armargosa tryonia (fresh water snail), Mojave ground squirrel, Mojave fringe-toed lizard, Navares Spring naucorid bug, Mono County Basin sage grouse, and the Western Yellow-billed cuckoo. Each, Kabala explained, would have its own economic impact study. Added to the that would be the species designated as endangered in the adjacent counties.
After some minor adjustments to the draft letter, it was unanimously approved.
when recreation is outlawed, only outlaws will recreate…
Right now all i see are rumors of restrictions, and people taking those rumors and running, really running, with them to jump to conclusions. The Federal government has placed no restrictions on use of the Sierra back country and has, so far, not announced any plans to do so. All… Read more »
DT, There aren’t restrictions yet because the endangered species and critical habitat designations having been made yet. Once those designations take effect, the restrictions will be inevitable and it will be far too late to do anything about it. Here is the logic, based on the Endangered Species Act: one,… Read more »
The economic impact study is misleading and essentially useless. The study only accounts for the costs to the feds of their responsibilities if the designation goes through. It does not even attempt to study the costs to local businesses and economies from the elimination of fishing activities in the mountains… Read more »
I used to see these frogs around Forester Pass quite often, and even cooked a few back in the 80s. It is a shame that people are spreading this disease around the high country and wiping out the frogs. I would have no problem restricting recreation if it meant the… Read more »