GBAPCD Board does not respond well to Inyo push for more members

apcdlogoDirector of the Great Basin Air Pollution Control District, Ted Schade, stated at the November 7th meeting of the District Board that “Every air-breathing person is my constituent and each of my board members is my constituent.” He was responding to Inyo Supervisors Linda Arcularious and Matt Kingsley who wanted to most serve their Inyo constituents. Schade and other Board Members focused on the air quality of all citizens of Inyo, Mono and Alpine Counties. According to observers at that meeting, Inyo Supervisors Linda Arcularius and Matt Kingsley disagreed. They wanted more for Inyo County but did not succeed in their move to expand the number of Inyo County seats on the APCD Board. Apparently benefits for Inyo and not the rest of the agencies represented on the Air Board was the priority for Arcularius and Kingsley.

Other Board members, according to some of those at the meeting, were not happy about Inyo’s priority. After a spirited discussion, the APCD Board asked their staff to analyze the issue and come back with what they discovered. A majority vote by each agency represented on the Board would have to take place before any changes could occur.

APCD Board Member Byng Hunt said, “I fully understand Matt and Linda’s supposed commitment to their constituents taking precedence to the issues involved with the APCD Board, but I do not agree with them. The APCD is a regionally based environmental organization that should be run independently of County politics and be focused on air quality issues of the Eastern Sierra.”

Hunt went on to say, “If they feel uncomfortable with their positions, perhaps they should allow other Supervisors to represent the area. Resistance to their proposal seemed to be the prevailing opinion of the majority of the Great Basin Board at last weeks meeting.”

Mammoth Mayor Jo Bacon was equally concerned. She said, “Everyone is my constituent. Issues like Mono Lake and Ormat Geothermal will come up over time. Things will change.” Bacon said she supported staff analyzing the situation. She said the new Board can consider this at the end of January meeting.

Ted Schade offered a similar view when he said, “The existing makeup of the Great Basin Board has allowed air quality standards to be met in Mammoth Lakes and Coso Junction and soon at Owens and Mono Lakes. There is no reason to change the makeup of a very successful environmental protection authority.”

 

2 Responses to GBAPCD Board does not respond well to Inyo push for more members

  1. Bob November 11, 2014 at 8:03 pm #

    Actually the request by Inyo is not too far off. Why does Mono County get two County reps and one Town of Mammoth Lakes rep? Should a City of Bishop rep be added? It seems the balance of power is already tipped in favor of Mono County.

     
  2. Steve November 12, 2014 at 8:38 am #

    Linda just can’t help her self but try and get one more selfish grab that is in support of LADWP. She can’t leave fast enough.

    I voted for Matt and sorry that I did. I will not vote for him again. By siding with Linda he has sold out Southern Inyo Co. By being in support of ground water pumping at Owens Lake for dust control he has jumped in with LADWP.

    LADWP will do enough damage to Inyo Co. with out the help of supervisors. The supervisors need to be standing in the way fighting to protect Inyo Co. from LADWP.

     

Leave a Reply



KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design