Hot Creek gets boost from CDFW

By Deb Murphy

The last four years of drought had a significant impact on Hot Creek, an iconic wild trout fishery south of Mammoth Lakes. Complaints from anglers and guides of fewer and smaller catches were, in this case, justified.

Kevin Peterson, manager of the Hot Creek Ranch for the past 10 years, watched it happen. “In 2008, we had 11 to 12,000 fish per mile; by 2016 that number was down to 1,000.” The creek suffered from low run-off out of the Eastern Sierra, a scenario repeated throughout the east side. No high seasonal flows flushed out the silt and vegetation build-up, water quality suffered. The flow into the creek is not regulated, so there wasn’t even a way to duplicate what nature should have been doing.

Peterson put in a call to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in July; after a series of studies to determine the creek’s condition, the department planted 6,000 sub-catchable Rainbows and Browns, above and below but not on the Ranch property, with plans to add another 12,000 in 2017 and 2018. The goal is a sustainable fishery, the stockers are breeders.

While “wild trout” is defined as simply born in the wild, Fish and Wildlife policy allows stocking of wild trout areas in situations like those presented at Hot Creek, according to the department’s environmental scientist Jim Erdman.

Department staff and a small army of volunteers walked the creek observing the conditions, Erdman said. Water temperatures and dissolved oxygen levels were measured to determine if the living conditions would support a fish plant.

The department will keep an eye on the creek with surveys through 2019. The planted sub-catchables will have their adipose fins removed to track natural recruitment.

Peterson is a happy ranch manager. “They saved the fishery,” he said. “The department stepped up and hit it out of the park. They rejuvenated Hot Creek.”

 

,

5 Responses to Hot Creek gets boost from CDFW

  1. Trouble November 4, 2016 at 4:10 am #

    Why do they only release non breading fish in the lower owens?

     
    • Trouble November 8, 2016 at 4:17 am #

      Someone want to explain why I got three thumbs down for asking a question?

       
  2. Philip Anaya November 4, 2016 at 4:28 am #

    Hats off to Kevin Peterson and the CDFW for a renewed Blue Ribbon fishery in the Eastern Sierra. There is nothing better than wild trout ceaselessly swimming in our lakes and streams and there is nothing better than fertile stockers once again being planted to renew a fishery . Many of us still do not understand the overriding benefits of stocking triploid trout for the put and take anglers . Manipulating chromosomes to render anything living “better”, or in this case infertile, just seems to be progress of the worst repute.
    And for the Forest Service as to what’s swimming in Hot Creek give us back our right to soak with the fishes and to use our swimming hole.

     
  3. wilderbeast November 7, 2016 at 1:46 pm #

    Because the state was sued by the good folks at the Center for BIological Diversity to prevent stocking anything but “Native fish” in the waters of the Eastern Sierra. Basically, what breeding fish are left are what will keep the species going forward or they will eventually only be found near where the stocking trucks stop. Can’t tell you the lakes and streams that have been stripped of trout because of the frog.

     
  4. Fish Dude November 10, 2016 at 9:24 am #

    Thanks for finally writing a piece on the Fishery.. Actually I am amazed because all of our local media has been avoiding this subject for years. Fishing still is an economic driver for our area, no matter what “recent studies” show. Another story in itself. So… can you all do a follow up? The truth behind the Triploid stocking, Who, What, Why, When, and How?? The hypocrisy within the CDFW..(diploids vs. triploids, there are NO Native Trout left to “protect” etc. etc.)) etc. etc. Where our fish license money is really going? The “Wild Trout” definition, why some lakes can get Brown Trout but others cannot, even though they are in same watershed? Such a big story. CDFW should be investigated and audited, in my humble opinion.. BTW.. The folks responsible for this calamity and dysfunction are CalTrout, Pacific Rivers Council, TU and CDFW Director Bonham.. The info is out there.. For more, read my Fish Report….http://bridgeportreservoir.com/index.php/fish-report/

     

Leave a Reply



KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design