Kingston Subdivision Tract Map approved by Planning Commission

By Deb Murphy

Bob Kingston’s 15-home subdivision on the Bishop Nursery site on Home Street raised a lot of heat from neighbors on Rome Drive over the last six months. Much of that heat had cooled by the Planning Commission meeting Tuesday evening.

Bob Kingston

Bob Kingston

While some of those neighbors assumed “the subdivision was a done deal,” the clincher seemed to be an agreement between the primary opponent Terrance Tye and Kingston reached earlier Tuesday.

Tye read off the elements of the agreement, much of which had been touched on in the Revised Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration, approved by City Council earlier this month. Two of those elements – homes across Bishop Creek from Rome Drive residents would be single story and a six-foot, solid concrete block topped with two feet of lattice would be built to shield homes from Rome residents – were added to the City’s Conditions of Approval.

The conditional use permit was approved 6-0; approval of the Tract Map passed 4-2. The subdivision map now goes to City Council.

Bishop Planning Commissioner Robert Lowthorp and Chair Darren Malloy listen to comments during public hearing on Kingston Subdivision

Bishop Planning Commissioner Robert Lowthorp and Chair Darren Malloy listen to comments during public hearing on Kingston Subdivision

The variances under discussion were: a 42-foot right-of-way rather than 60-foot, subtracting the planter strip and sidewalk on the first 250-feet on the south side of subdivision road; a 28-foot radius hammer head turn-around rather than a 50-foot radius cul de sac; less than the minimum 7,500 square foot lot size for 11 of the homes and less than 50-foot frontage for two of the homes on the turn around.

Following Kingston’s brief statement, project engineer Andy Holmes of Triad/Holmes Associates, Inc. explained the rationale behind the request for variances, which boiled down to maintaining an R-1 residential development within the constraints of the 2.75 acre lot. The street into the subdivision abuts the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power property south of the current Bishop Nursery parking lot. Lots 14 and 15 run along the road. “If the street right-of-way width went to 60-feet, those lots would be too narrow for R-1,” Holmes said. “We had the option of condos or apartments, but Bob wanted it R-1.”

Holmes’ background includes participation on Inyo County’s advisory board for its General Plan and Housing Element. According to Holmes, some of Bishop’s zoning is unique to Bishop. Planning Director Gary Schley said the city intended to update zoning ordinances in the very near future.

Commissioner Robert Lowthorp asked each of the ten public commenters if they approved of the project. All but three did in principle, but had concerns about the variances for safety reasons. Two did not approve of the project and Tye would not answer the question.

When Chair Darren Malloy closed the public hearing and began the Commission discussion, Lowthorp asked the most obvious question: If this is a private street, why are we paying so much attention to it? Schley reminded him of one of the requested variances to Bishop’s ordinances—private streets had to comply with public street standards.

Commissioners came up with suggestions to solve the no-sidewalk on the south side of the first 250-feet or street. Malloy put the issue in perspective. “This is a 42-foot wide road that goes nowhere. There will be no through traffic. This is a dead-end street with a 15 mph speed limit.” In response to speakers’ mention of Bishop’s apparent obsession with sidewalks, Malloy said the obsession was driven by Safe to School grants.

None of the commissioners were too concerned about the absence of planter strips.

One of the little Bishop quirks was that if the lots were developed individually, the minimum would be 5,000 square feet; but ordinances required a development’s minimum lot size be 7,500 square feet. “Forty-year old ordinances are hard to change,” Malloy said. “That’s why we have requests for variances.”

The lot sizes in the subdivision range from 5,104 to 8,229 sq. ft. with the building pad taking up from 60-65-percent of the lot.

The only hint of excitement came in regards to the Tye/Kingston agreement over fencing along the Rome Drive side of the development, which would end up eight feet tall. City Counsel Ryan Jones suggested that height may require another variance which could not be voted on that night as it was not agendized. Jones and Schley found fence height ordinance wording; Jones said the agreement stipulation could be added to the Condition of Approval.

 

, , ,

9 Responses to Kingston Subdivision Tract Map approved by Planning Commission

  1. Jason January 28, 2016 at 6:37 am #

    And now on to all the other State and City building code requirements…if anyone wonders why housing costs so much, here is a prime example.

     
    • Tinner January 28, 2016 at 8:32 pm #

      Jason, yup yup.
      Which is partly why the American dream is dead for many in the Eastern Sierra.

       
      • sugar magnolia January 29, 2016 at 3:41 pm #

        Ok, I’ll give you that it’s part of the equation, but certainly not the main part. I think CEO’s making 300 times the average workers instead of paying a living wage to workers is the number 1 reason why the american dream has gone down the tubes.

        If you work 40 hours a week in our country, you should be able to at least afford to rent an apartment, not that that is our dream, just an indicator of how far things have slipped.

        40 hours a week at $10/hour doesn’t even rent you a 1 bedroom apartment in Bishop! Pretty damn sad, that’s all I can say.

         
  2. Low-Inyo January 30, 2016 at 7:06 am #

    If the “American dream ” is dead for many in the Eastern Sierra,as you say,only one thing left to do…..move….and be seeking it somewhere else….that you owe to yourself..

     
    • Jeremy January 30, 2016 at 12:46 pm #

      Very much agreed Low-Inyo! Not every place is for everyone. There are many cheaper options in other parts of this country than this area. This is a special place that costs higher than average to live….as it should.

       
  3. Warpaint January 30, 2016 at 1:10 pm #

    Ever occur to anyone that this illegal immigration (invasion) is done by design. Corporate America with the help of Politicians (D)&(R) are doing this to lower job wages and crush the middle class. H1b visas included.

    So, now If I’m a software company for example, I can choose between some young immigrant with an H1b visa and a diploma, over your child that you spent a fortune on to go to a University. Because the immigrant will work for less and produce more, right? (Correct)

    The establishment meaning both political parties have taken the American dream and stomped on it.
    Now, where are you gonna move now SLOW-INYO?
    The American dream in the Eastern Sierra has been dead for years. When was the last time you drove a dirt road not owned by government? You havent.

     
    • Charles O. Jones February 1, 2016 at 10:46 am #

      There are plenty of dirt roads not owned “by government”. Most of them have locked gates keeping everyone out.

       
  4. Low-Inyo January 30, 2016 at 7:23 pm #

    fingerpaint….I’m not going anywhere..I’m doing fine where I’m at…when I happen to drive on a dirt road,it doesn’t bother me a bit that it might be owned by the Government….
    I’m maybe not living the “American dream “,as far as a big fancy house with 2 fancy vehicles and a big,fat retirement coming soon,but I choose not to be angry about it,or thinking the reason I might not have or get that is because of the “immigrant invasion “,or thinking it’s some type of Government conspiracy being the reason I don’t have or won’t get it….as far as the “American dream ” being dead in the Eastern Sierra “for years”,my advise to you,as I tried to state nicely above in responding to Tinner,……move…..seek it somewhere else….you owe it to yourself to do that,not go through your life all angry…..buy a globe,put on a blindfold,spin the globe,place your finger on it before it stops…..and move there….maybe a better place for you to go to and possibly be happier….maybe even another Country where they have tougher immigration laws and no Government conspiracies against the middle-class workers….

     
  5. Sierramon February 2, 2016 at 4:33 pm #

    To experience life in a state with no or little public lands go to Texas. Locked gates everywhere, no trespass signs. No real 4×4 opportunities, quads or bikes only at pay-to-play OHV parks. To hunt or fish must join a club with access only on the paid for and assigned location. Cost varies based on proximity to a population center, about $850.00 per rod or gun per season in rural areas up to $2,500.00 within days drive of an urban center. Very few hiking opportunities other than small state parks. Only federal land is in the SW Corner Big Bend area which is similar to California along the Mexican border east of Tecate. There are large ranches with fenced hunting ranges holding exotic game, those cost thousands for a one time hunt. I was glad to get back to the Pacific Coast region.

     

Leave a Reply



KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design