State decision puts Tri-Valley water in a bind

By Deb Murphy
The California Department of Water Resources rejected a multi-agency request for a basin boundary modification that would separate the Tri-Valley (Hammil, Chalfant and Benton) water basin from the Owens Valley basin.
In addition, DWR identified Fish Slough as a sub-basin, the majority of which lies in the Tri-Valley area.
Only dedicated water-watchers and a handful of farmers off Hwy. 6 fully understand what that means. Briefly: the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act required all medium and high priority water basins to form Groundwater Sustainability Agencies which would then develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans, in essence to avoid the mess that exists in the Central Valley.
The Owens Valley Basin on land owned by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power was deemed an “adjudicated basin” courtesy of the Long Term Water Agreement which, hypothetically, safeguards groundwater as well as requiring mitigation for negative impacts on the environment from over-pumping.
The Tri-Valley Groundwater Management District, Inyo and Mono counties supported the boundary re-alignment that coincided with the county line. Inyo was the lead agency on the request.
The hope of Tri-Valley, an all-volunteer agency with no budget, was the separate basin would be identified as low-priority requiring neither a GSA nor a GSP.
As one of the handful of alfalfa growers in the Tri-Valley area, district board member Dave Doonan isn’t too happy with the decision. “You could almost count on two hands the number of (impacted) water users in the district,” he said. “If we can’t afford to do a plan, the state will.”
The issue of declining agriculture is big with Doonan. “Agriculture is elastic,” he said. “If we have a bad water year, we can reduce production.” If ag is replaced with housing tracts and strip malls, the elasticity snaps.
Inyo’s Water Department’s request was based on science, not political boundaries.
The science is explained in the request summary: “The request is based on the presence of a subsurface barrier to groundwater flow between Chalfant Valley and Owens Valley that results in groundwater discharge to springs and wetlands at Fish Slough and relatively little groundwater flow from the Tri Valleys region into Owens Valley. The evidence for the groundwater barrier is geophysical (a gravity anomaly indicative of a bedrock barrier in the alluvial basin fill), geological (a fault that diverts groundwater from the Tri Valley area into springs and wetlands at Fish Slough) and hydrological (groundwater discharge at Fish Slough and modeling suggesting relatively low groundwater flux from the Tri Valley region into Owens Valley.”
According to Water Department Director Bob Harrington, DWR “didn’t think our evidence for a groundwater barrier was sufficient and they had received a lot of opposition to the request from tribes.”
Comments were provided by the Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley, Ceal Klinger and the Owens Valley Committee questioning the science and urging protection of Fish Slough water sources.
According to Harrington, Tri-Valley “would have to include Fish Slough in any plan they develop.” The same is true of the portion of the slough that lies in Inyo, but “the only groundwater pumping in Owens Valley that would be likely to affect Fish Slough would be LADWP’s and that would be regulated under the Long Term Water Agreement, not SGMA.”
So what happens next? According to Doonan, the district is information gathering and talking to state legislators. Harrington outlined the state process: “The DWR presents draft recommendations in a briefing to the California Water Commission on July 21 and then presents final recommendations to the September 21. The Commission adopts recommendations and they’re published in an update to Bulletin 118.”
 

,

2 Responses to State decision puts Tri-Valley water in a bind

  1. Philip Anaya July 15, 2016 at 10:29 am #

    The “Adjudicated” and the “Non-Adjudicated” areas of the Owens River Basin share the common goal of Groundwater Sustainability. The dynamic between the two areas, one with a preexisting management and the other with a management yet to be developed, is a question mark still to be answered . Is the groundwater extraction in an adjudicated portion of a Basin allowed to effect the water table of the non-adjudicated portion of the Basin violating the non-adjudicated Groundwater Sustainability Plan? Hopefully not.
    More specifically, will DWP be allowed to extract groundwater from Five Bridges effecting Fish Slough and the Tri Valley areas or will DWP Extraction Operations need to consider sustainability and effects on the water table in these non-adjudicated portions of the Basin. Under a common goal of “sustainability” of the Groundwater Sustainability Management Act the future is now and hopefully this means LADWP will no longer be free from scrutiny and regulation .
    This decision by the DWR is a victory for the environment in the Eastern Sierra and is notification that local governing entities will have the power and the responsibility to regulate groundwater. This is a positive and a necessary step in the pathway towards the LADWP, Inyo County and the LTWA achieving the goals of sustainability . Many thanks and continued success to those who have and will contribute to that goal,

     
  2. MJA July 16, 2016 at 6:04 am #

    The only thing in need of management in all of nature is ourselves. =

     

Leave a Reply



KSRW · 1280 N. Main St. Suite J · Bishop, CA 93514 · 760-873-5329
Positive Projections Web Design