Groups, residents oppose mining at Conglomerate Mesa

Friends of the Inyo, Sierra Club press release

RESIDENTS UNITE IN OPPOSITION TO MINING AT CONGLOMERATE MESA

Bureau of Land Management defies community consensus; gives the green light for gold exploration near Death Valley National Park

Bishop, CA — The Bureau of the Land Management recently announced a decision to allow exploration for gold at Conglomerate Mesa, a remote and wild corner of Inyo County adjacent to Death Valley National Park. This decision endangers the area’s recreation and tourism-based economy, delicate water supply, and unique important ecosystem and cultural resources. The decision also flies in the face of the community’s clear opposition to the project, which it expressed at the Inyo County Board of Supervisors meeting when the project was discussed. 

Silver Standard Resources (SSR Inc.) proposes to drill 1,000 feet down into Conglomerate Mesa at seven locations to collect samples which will then be analyzed for their gold deposits. The company’s proposal provides that it will access the drill sites by helicopter in the next several months and haul water by truck from an unknown offsite location. If ultimately permitted, this activity will create dust and noise disturbance to visitors and wildlife as well as deplete scarce water sources.

The ultimate objective of SSR Mining, Inc – is to create a large, industrial-scale open pit cyanide heap leach gold mine. Such an operation would permanently damage the area’s wild character, degrade wildlife habitat, and deplete local water supplies” said Wendy Schneider, Executive Director of Friends of the Inyo.  “We are disappointed to see the approval of a project that is clearly in direct contradiction to public opinion.  In the long-term, the local economy will certainly suffer if this project goes forward.”

Last fall, the BLM conducted a comment period for the public to weigh in on the exploration proposal.  The public overwhelmingly expressed grave concerns about the project.  Other problems include that, in its environmental review, the BLM failed to identify or analyze the likely effects of a large scale mining operation or the cumulative impacts to cultural resources, air quality, soil, groundwater, wildlife, and native plants. For the first time in recent history, under immense public pressure, the Inyo County Board of Supervisors submitted a letter to BLM taking a neutral position on the mining exploration.

“The Perdito exploration is located within an area that BLM previously identified as being wild and undeveloped and providing opportunities for solitude and quiet recreation” said Linda Castro, Assistant Policy Director of the California Wilderness Coalition. “By allowing exploratory drilling, BLM is facilitating Silver Standard Resources in compromising those qualities. Even worse, the ultimate result of the exploratory drilling (an open-pit mine) will forever and permanently destroy those qualities.”

 “Tourist based outdoor recreation is the economic engine for the Eastern Sierra. Local businesses are highly dependent on outdoor recreation” said Kevin Mazzu, Lone Pine small business owner. “The thousands of people who visit Death Valley National Park, the Alabama Hills and other surrounding public lands are our most powerful economic driver.”

“If we let this company get a foothold we won’t be able to stop them. Once exploration begins it opens the flood gates” said Kathy Bancroft, Lone Pine Paiute Shoshone Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. “This is a project about greed. That’s why we are united as a community in stopping this project now at the early stages.”

Outstanding features of Conglomerate Mesa include:

●      It’s location on Death Valley’s doorstep, making it part of this beloved National Park’s view-scape.  Visitors to the park contribute millions to the Eastern Sierra’s economy. Travel and tourism businesses comprise roughly a third of employment in Inyo County;

●      The sweeping views it offers of multiple desert ranges, the Sierra Nevada and Owen Lake;

●      Unique and irreplaceable cultural resources important to the Timbisha-Shoshone and Paiute-Shoshone Tribes, including a population of pinyon trees traditionally harvested for their nuts;

●      Historical resources, including the remains of charcoal and stone masonry sites used in the late 1800’s to supply the Cerro Gordo mine and an historic trail from this same time period;

●      Multiple special status and rare plant species, including a successfully-reproducing rare species of high altitude Joshua Trees;

●      Mule deer overwintering and migration habitat, prized by local and visiting hunters;

●      Hunting grounds for golden eagles and mountain lions; and

●      It is the first roadless area in California faced with development threats under the Trump Administration.

Conglomerate Mesa is a special natural area on Death Valley’s doorstep,” said Fran Hunt, Eastern Sierra Organizer of the Sierra Club, “It’s too special to sacrifice to industrial scale, open pit cyanide heap leach mining that would forever mar views from within and near the park and destroy important cultural, wildlife and recreational economy values.” 

Friends of the Inyo, the Sierra Club and partners are reviewing the decision and deciding on next steps.

# # #

About Friends of the Inyo

Founded in 1986, Friends of the Inyo’s mission is to protect and care for the public lands of the Eastern Sierra.https://friendsoftheinyo.org

About the Sierra Club

Founded by legendary conservationist John Muir in 1892, the Sierra Club is now the nation’s largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization — with three million members and supporters. https://www.sierraclub.org/

 

, , ,

6 Responses to Groups, residents oppose mining at Conglomerate Mesa

  1. David Dennison May 22, 2018 at 7:15 am #

    If this mining operation does go through,being so close to Death Valley, if it profits,I’m sure trump will add that National Park to his list of those that he wants sold here in California to the private sector and to the highest bidder.That way for him and his decisions to somehow profit off of the destruction of the environment and wildlife here in his hated State of California.

     
  2. Darlene May 22, 2018 at 3:33 pm #

    The Mining Law of 1872 gives a foreign mining company, SSR is a Vancouver Canadian company, the right to extract and sell minerals from public lands without paying a cent in royalties to the federal government.
    This means they pay 155 dollars per existing claim site, ruin the land, take the profits and leave the mess for John Q. Public to clean up. For those interested, in 2013, Canada’s Barrick Gold produced 1.3 million ounces of gold at 1400.00 an once. Their profit came to 1.8 billion dollars, but nothing was paid in royalties to our government. My question is this: Is the BLM the guardians of our public lands or a broker for foreign companies.

     
  3. Tinner May 22, 2018 at 4:00 pm #

    David Dennison, or is it Low-Inyo?
    Get ahold of yourself, bro.

     
  4. Kermit The Frog May 24, 2018 at 10:30 am #

    This article is unbelievable biased. I expect this from CNN or MSNBC, but not a local news source. A lot of this article was copied word for word from the Friends of the Inyo website.

     
  5. David Dennison May 24, 2018 at 2:55 pm #

    Kermit…Let’s try to remember a few years back,when that money-making mining operation “Cougar Gold “,where one of it’s CEO’s was a former Sara Palin cronie,which means a good chance he was a liar,tried to make it’s way up into the Bodie Hills, stating they would hire “hundreds of locals” and make the town of Bridgeport rich.Then when it wasn’t moving along fast enough for them,here came the threats of doing it anyway without local or Government approval,even though in a protected wilderness area.When they were questioned about contanemants possibly getting into and onto the ground or danger to wildlife with their planned open-pit exploratory drilling,they said nothing to worry about,stating if there was any waste,it would dump into the “Nevada-side” of things.If you archive that article and story,see what the Bridgeport locals and Mono Supervisors had to say about that and how it ended.

     
  6. Mark May 28, 2018 at 10:43 am #

    As a local resident I support the proposal to dig exploratory holes there- and no, the Friends of the Inyo do not represent my opinions on the matter.

     

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.